Workflow in scope
The highest-risk matter or document journey from identity and upload through retrieval, drafting, and review.
48-hour launch review for Legaltech
Know what needs fixing before you launch.
Legal teams need faster document and knowledge work without allowing unsupported citations, leaked matter data, or unreviewed advice to reach clients. $750 to $1,500 in 48 hours: plain-English readiness report, severity ranking, and a prioritised fix list before real users hit broken paths.
Source-backed assistance with clear human review · $750 to $1,500 · 48-hour turnaround
Direct answer
Legaltech · Ship with Confidence Review
What does this engagement mean for legaltech teams?
A legaltech readiness review should prioritise matter isolation, privilege-sensitive data, uploaded documents, citations, access invitations, and error paths. Fluency is not enough if a system retrieves the wrong matter or exposes confidential text through logs.
Likely system boundaries
- Authentication, matter roles, and tenant boundaries
- Document, retrieval, and AI provider configuration
- Storage, logs, invitations, and deployment settings
Evidence required
- Matter data cannot cross clients or teams
- Sensitive documents and logs are properly restricted
- Unsupported citations and unreviewed external actions are blocked
Important boundary
The review covers the agreed application surface. It is not a penetration test, legal audit, or privilege determination.
Who this is for
For Legaltech founders who moved fast with AI tools and need a straight answer before they ship.
Built for solo founders, non-technical founders, and early-stage teams with consumer apps, micro-SaaS, or marketing-led products. You do not need a technical background. You need a clear list of what will actually break in the next week-before real users, investors, or your own reputation are on the line.
- You shipped an app with Cursor, Bolt, Claude Code, Lovable, or similar tools.
- You are not sure whether your flows, integrations, or deployment config will hold up with real users.
- The happy path works, but edge cases, empty states, and error handling were never really tested.
- You want a clear written report, not a vague “you should hire a developer someday.”
What we look for
The failure patterns that show up when AI builds the first version.
Broken flows, missing states, and error conditions that will surface with real users on day one
Missing validation, silent failures, and edge cases the AI left unhandled
API integrations and third-party services that are connected but not correctly configured
N+1 queries, missing indexes, and unoptimised payloads that will visibly degrade under real traffic
Environment variables, build settings, and hosting config gaps that cause prod-vs-dev divergence
Gaps between the happy path and what actually happens: loading states, empty states, and error handling
What you receive
A report you can act on this week.
The review is priced between $750 to $1,500 based on codebase size, number of integrations, and complexity. Delivered in 48 hours from access. If you want the issues fixed after the report, remediation is available at $120/hr with a clear priority order.
Plain-English readiness report
Each finding explained in terms of real-world consequence: what a real user would experience, not a stack trace.
Severity ranking
Launch Blocker / High / Medium / Low, based on actual likelihood and user impact, not raw tool output.
Prioritised fix list
Ordered by impact, with the smallest number of changes that make the biggest difference to launch confidence.
Walkthrough call
15 to 20 minute call to walk through findings and answer “what do I fix first”, not an open-ended support line.
Out of Scope
Penetration testing, compliance certification (SOC 2 / HIPAA / PCI-DSS / ISO), prompt-injection or LLM red-teaming, ongoing monitoring, or a guarantee of zero vulnerabilities.
Frequently Asked Questions