Workflow in scope
One customer, analyst, or operator journey covering identity, data access, a consequential action, and confirmation.
48-hour launch review for Fintech
Know what needs fixing before you launch.
Financial workflows carry sensitive data and consequential actions, so a fluent AI answer is not enough without traceability and approval boundaries. $750 to $1,500 in 48 hours: plain-English readiness report, severity ranking, and a prioritised fix list before real users hit broken paths.
Explainable automation around high-consequence financial work · $750 to $1,500 · 48-hour turnaround
Direct answer
Fintech · Ship with Confidence Review
What does this engagement mean for fintech teams?
A fintech app review should test identity, role boundaries, sensitive data, payment and webhook paths, and failure handling around consequential actions. The key question is whether the system can fail safely when the provider says success but the business state is still unknown.
Likely system boundaries
- Authentication, roles, and tenant isolation
- Ledger, KYC, payment, and messaging APIs
- Webhooks, audit logs, and environment configuration
Evidence required
- Users cannot access another customer's financial records
- Payment and account actions are idempotent
- Provider timeouts trigger verification and safe escalation
Important boundary
This is a focused application-readiness review, not a penetration test, financial audit, or regulatory certification.
Who this is for
For Fintech founders who moved fast with AI tools and need a straight answer before they ship.
Built for solo founders, non-technical founders, and early-stage teams with consumer apps, micro-SaaS, or marketing-led products. You do not need a technical background. You need a clear list of what will actually break in the next week-before real users, investors, or your own reputation are on the line.
- You shipped an app with Cursor, Bolt, Claude Code, Lovable, or similar tools.
- You are not sure whether your flows, integrations, or deployment config will hold up with real users.
- The happy path works, but edge cases, empty states, and error handling were never really tested.
- You want a clear written report, not a vague “you should hire a developer someday.”
What we look for
The failure patterns that show up when AI builds the first version.
Broken flows, missing states, and error conditions that will surface with real users on day one
Missing validation, silent failures, and edge cases the AI left unhandled
API integrations and third-party services that are connected but not correctly configured
N+1 queries, missing indexes, and unoptimised payloads that will visibly degrade under real traffic
Environment variables, build settings, and hosting config gaps that cause prod-vs-dev divergence
Gaps between the happy path and what actually happens: loading states, empty states, and error handling
What you receive
A report you can act on this week.
The review is priced between $750 to $1,500 based on codebase size, number of integrations, and complexity. Delivered in 48 hours from access. If you want the issues fixed after the report, remediation is available at $120/hr with a clear priority order.
Plain-English readiness report
Each finding explained in terms of real-world consequence: what a real user would experience, not a stack trace.
Severity ranking
Launch Blocker / High / Medium / Low, based on actual likelihood and user impact, not raw tool output.
Prioritised fix list
Ordered by impact, with the smallest number of changes that make the biggest difference to launch confidence.
Walkthrough call
15 to 20 minute call to walk through findings and answer “what do I fix first”, not an open-ended support line.
Out of Scope
Penetration testing, compliance certification (SOC 2 / HIPAA / PCI-DSS / ISO), prompt-injection or LLM red-teaming, ongoing monitoring, or a guarantee of zero vulnerabilities.
Frequently Asked Questions